What did Javier Miele smoke, you may wonder?
Mieles proposal to legalize the sale of organs has sparked intense debates and elicited passionate reactions from various factions.
"My first property is my body; why shouldn't I be able to dispose of my body?
Mercopress.com
The "transplant tourism"… priceless value of kidneys, for poorest people in countries like the Philippines or India.
The ethical dilemma surrounding the global organ shortage is a critical issue that demands our attention. The current number of kidney transplants performed each year falls drastically short of the staggering demand from the 1 million individuals suffering from end-stage renal disease. It beckons us to ponder whether the establishment of a worldwide market for organ sales could provide a viable solution.
However, the real concern lies in finding a way to harmonize a profit-driven system with the noble objective of saving lives without subjecting the impoverished to exploitation. These multifaceted questions were comprehensively addressed by a diverse array of experts, comprising distinguished medical professionals, international health specialists, and esteemed ethicists, who gathered for an enlightening symposium hosted at Harvard University. The symposium's insightful discussions, under the guidance of the esteemed Chairman Daniel E. Wikler, revealed the inherently susceptible and disconcerting nature of this subject, with elements intertwined with a sense of profound tragedy.
The fate of countless patients in desperate need of organ transplants teeters precariously, whilst on the opposing end of the spectrum, the vulnerable and destitute find themselves exposed to the perils of an expanding industry known as "transplant tourism." The focus of this significant conference revolved around kidney transplantation, with Wikler poignantly accentuating the immeasurable value of kidneys - a treasure akin to diamonds, even in the possession of the poorest individuals in countries like the Philippines or India.
However, amidst the anguish of debilitating illnesses, it remains paramount to safeguard the moral fabric of society. Thus, our pursuit for solutions to the organ shortage must be underpinned by unwavering adherence to moral standards, as they guide us on this tireless quest for a just and ethical resolution.o protect, said the one-time chief ethicist for the World Health Organization (WHO). However, “with life hanging in the balance,” said Wikler of organ markets, “we need compelling moral reasons to get in the way.”
Medical systems worldwide are far from meeting the needs of kidney-transplant candidates, said Luc Noël, who tracks transplantation issues for WHO in Geneva. Nevertheless, he said there is also an urgent need for global resolve. In the past decade, WHO and other groups have called for international standards to protect the poor, monitor transplantation quality, keep the process transparent, and ban commercialization (now mainly driven by the Internet).
In the current global hodgepodge of transplant tourism, he said that thousands of patients — from the United States, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and other prosperous nations — get the kidneys they need. But their donors (some of them exploited by organized crime) frequently get the short and sharp end of the stick.
Harvard.EDU
Dear readers,
Here at Germán & Co., we highly value objective and ethical thinking. We are committed to delivering high-quality and precise information. To achieve this, we have invested in thorough research, necessary software licenses, and appropriate venues. Our blog has a loyal readership that admires our dedication to journalism.
Yet, maintaining this standard requires financial support. We kindly ask our readers to stand in solidarity and provide support, even a minimum contribution of 2 Euros. Your contribution helps uphold our blog, improve our content, and reach a larger audience. Each donation, regardless of size, greatly assists us in fulfilling our mission. With your support, we can continue to operate independently and uphold unbiased journalism.
We sincerely express our gratitude to you,
The Team
Argentina's deep economic crisis...
The economic crisis in Argentina has led to an unfortunate reality of public spaces being converted into makeshift settlements for those experiencing homelessness. This situation is not unique to the country. The Ezeiza International Airport in Buenos Aires demonstrates the severity of the issue, with open public areas being transformed into temporary shelters resembling the Salvation Army hostel. The scene is distressing as families are crowded together with their belongings scattered, and a sense of despair weighing heavily in the air.
However, the proposed idea by the peculiar candidate for Argentina's presidency, Javier Mielie, to tackle the economic crisis by converting the national currency from pesos to dollars and even advocating for organ sale is both unethical and unsettling. Objective evaluation of such approaches is necessary. The suggestion of commodifying human organs for monetary gain is inhumane and challenges the essence of our humanity.
It is important to find solutions that uphold our moral values and protect human dignity, especially in times when the most vulnerable members of society are suffering. Instead of resorting to extreme measures that exploit individuals and compromise their well-being, we should concentrate on implementing policies that encourage inclusive economic growth, provide social safety nets, and support sustainable development. By tackling the fundamental causes of the crisis and striving for long-term solutions, we can create a more promising future that upholds the rights and dignity of all citizens.
It is important that leaders, both in Argentina and worldwide, place compassion and empathy at the forefront when facing difficult circumstances. By uniting and acknowledging the inherent value of every individual, we can promote a society where no one is marginalized, and the conversion of public spaces from shelters back into lively communal areas becomes a possibility. This crisis provides Argentina with a chance to reassess its economic policies and work towards a fairer and more just society, where healthcare, education, and basic necessities are readily available.
During these unsettled times, it is important to recognize our interconnectedness and understand that we must work together to overcome challenges. We must not forget our common humanity and responsibility to create a world where economic crises do not drive people to despair. Together, we can help create a future in which public spaces serve as sanctuaries of hope and families find solace and security instead of being forced to reside in makeshift settlements due to the economic crisis.
Perhaps the only factual statement regarding the polarising Argentine presidential candidate is his declaration to rid Argentina of its corrupt political elite responsible for the poverty and destitution of its people. This bold claim has caught the attention of many, sparking both hope and skepticism among the population.
In relation to this issue, the head of the United Nations' regional office for the area, ECLAC's Ms Alicia Becerra, also voiced her concerns in October 2022.
“She emphasized the need for countries to strategically direct public spending towards economic revitalization and transformation. Her call to action includes bolstering public investment in sectors that promote job creation, gender equality, social inclusion, and productive change, while also ensuring an equal transition towards environmental sustainability. It is an ambitious approach that seeks to address the multifaceted challenges faced by Argentina and many other nations worldwide.
The urgency of this matter has been further underscored by the devastating impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Ms Becerra highlighted the significant and long-lasting negative impacts on the economy, productivity, and society as a whole. Increased inequality, poverty, and unemployment have become all too familiar consequences of the crisis. Sadly, it is anticipated that the return of economic activity (GDP) to pre-pandemic levels will be slower than the recovery observed during the subprime crisis of 2007-2008, which further compounds the complexities of the current situation. In light of these circumstances, the promises made by the Argentine presidential candidate take on an even greater significance, as they offer a glimmer of hope for a better future amid the uncertainty and hardship faced by the nation…
Javier Mieles' thought is controversial...
Byy his radical ideas to completely dismantle the Argentinean political system, has captivated the attention of many. Javier is resolute in his mission to challenge the entrenched "caste" that he believes has tainted the realm of politics in Argentina.
Giving a kick in the ass to the rancid and corrupt Argentinean political system, which he calls: "caste"...
He has even proposed the controversial notion of legalising the sale of organs, which has sent shockwaves throughout the country. This provocative idea, unveiled almost a year ago, continues to arouse curiosity and controversy among the population.
To truly understand the man behind these bold propositions, we must delve into Mr Miele's background. Born on October 22, 1970, in the vibrant and bohemian neighbourhood of Palermo in Buenos Aires, Javier has become increasingly famous, surpassing even revered figures such as Diego Armando Maradona, Pope Francis, and the Kirchner family. Although his physical appearance is enigmatic, with distinctive bushy sideburns resembling the former president Carlos Menem, it is just one aspect of his unique personality.
Javier's psychedelic nature permeates not only his ideas but also his theatrical gestures and unconventional thoughts. It is these very traits that have propelled him into the spotlight and sparked hope among those yearning for change in the outdated and perilous political landscape. Yet, amidst all the fame and charisma, a lingering question remains:
Who is Javier Miele, truly?
Milei, an economist and political outsider, has been compared to former US President Donald Trump and former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro. He has gained a significant following for his right-wing beliefs, TV appearances, and background as a rock musician. His bombastic style has also contributed to his popularity. Dubbed "The Wig" for his dramatic, unkempt hairstyle - he claims it is because he does not comb it - the self-proclaimed anarcho-capitalist draws on anger towards corruption, the ruling class, and the political elite.
As a young man, Milei played goalkeeper for a second-division football team before studying economics at the University of Belgrano in Buenos Aires. He has taught economics and written several books, including "The Path of the Libertarian" and his latest work, "The End of Inflation." He began his political career in 2021 with an "anti-caste" focus and is now a member of the lower house of Argentina's Congress. His previous band, Everest, primarily performed songs by the Rolling Stones.
What is the underlying motivation behind his bid to become the President of Argentina?
Via his Freedom Advances political party, Milei has consistently promised to restore freedom to Argentinians, allowing them to assume control over their own future. A crucial component of his agenda includes abolishing the nation's Central Bank, an idea that his campaign initially disavowed but eventually acknowledged. Additionally, Milei recommends the dollarisation of the economy, a policy Argentina has previously implemented with unfavourable outcomes.
Argentina experienced an economic crisis in 1991 during the presidency of Carlos Menem. In the midst of this turmoil, Eduardo Cavallo, the head of the national economic system, implemented a peso-to-dollar parity of 1:1, a decision that ultimately proved successful. However, in 2001, President Fernando de la Rua continued Cavallo's policies but faced limited success and widespread public outrage, leading to his resignation.
In addition to Milei's controversial stance, he rejects climate change as a "socialist deception," despite Argentina grappling with a severe three-year drought that experts warn may have been worsened by rising temperatures associated with climate change. This bold rejection of scientific consensus not only raises additional questions about Milei's stance on environmental issues, but also highlights his disregard for the potential impact of climate change on the country's already vulnerable ecosystem. In summary, Milei's political ideology, which aims to return freedom to the people and dismantle institutions such as the Central Bank, draws parallels to previous monetary policies that Argentina has implemented during times of economic hardship. However, his denial of climate change and disregard for environmental issues set him apart from the pressing need for sustainability and considerate management of resources in today's world.
Moreover, in addition to his divisive stance on climate change, Milei has voiced extreme perspectives on other debatable matters. For example, he proposes that the procurement and transfer of organs be regarded as "another marketplace." This position is bound to trigger strong arguments among ethicists and backers of organ donation.
Furthermore, Milei has expressed a strong opposition to abortion, which was legalized in Argentina in 2020. This disagreement with a personal choice raises concerns about his attitude towards women's rights and access to comprehensive healthcare. Milei's views on sex education also reveal a contentious perspective. He argues that sex education is part of a 'post-Marxist agenda' aimed at dismantling the concept of the family. This argument fails to acknowledge the significance of comprehensive sexual education in promoting healthy relationships while preventing issues like unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections. Additionally, it ignores the diverse structures that families can possess and enforces a narrow and exclusionary definition.
To further reinforce his contentious position, Milei has pledged to address Argentina's public payroll by either closing or privatising state institutions. He has even expressed intentions to close ministries and dismiss civil servants employed in 2023. While this assertive approach may seem attractive to those seeking swift budget cuts and fiscal discipline, it raises concerns about the possible impact on public services and the livelihoods of those working in the public sector.
In conclusion, Milei's political perspectives and daring assertions elicit powerful responses from all sides of the spectrum. While some may find his ideologies appealing, it is worth noting his dismissal of crucial environmental issues and denial of climate change highlights a concerning lack of understanding and empathy. Moreover, his radical opinions regarding organ trading, abortion, and sex education further contribute to the complexity and divisiveness of his platform.
Image: Germán & Co